Impact Newswire

The World Has the Money to Fund Sustainable Development, but the System is Broken — OECD

The world Has the Money to Fund Sustainable Development, but the System is Broken — OECD
FILE PHOTO: Former U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken listens as Mathias Cormann, Secretary-General of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, speaks during a press briefing at the OECD’s Ministerial Council Meeting, in Paris, France October 6, 2021. Ian Langsdon/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

Ever so often, we hear the same grim math: the world urgently needs trillions of dollars to meet the Sustainable Development Goals, and the gap is widening. And yes, the world does need money to finance climate resilience/readiness and other basic public services. But as it turns out, the main issue is not that the money isn’t available; instead, the system is frustrating the process of channelling said money where it is most needed.

This point was raised in chapter one (page 33) of the OECD’s new Global Outlook on Financing for Sustainable Development 2025. The problem is not only about how much money exists, it’s also mainly about how the global financing architecture channels (or blocks) that money from flowing where it’s needed most. This distinction is the narrative the media should focus on, because the public deserves to know the truth. 

What You Should Know

The OECD report showed that between 2015 and 2022, estimated annual financing needs for developing and emerging economies surged by roughly 36%, largely driven by climate impacts and rising fragility. Meanwhile, available resources only rose about 22%. This resulted in an estimated SDG financing gap that ballooned from around $2.5 trillion to $4 trillion per year. These are not abstract figures; they translate into unbuilt dams, under-equipped hospitals, children out of school, and crops left unprotected from drought… all in places that are already disproportionately hit by climate and domestic crises.

But this can change. The OECD report points to pragmatic levers that can be deployed now in the form of blended finance to derisk private capital, catalytic concessional capital to mobilise whole markets, and guarantees to crowd in local banks and institutional investors. These aren’t magic words; they are plumbing. They change incentives, lower perceived risks and turn a would-be one-off grant into long-lasting investment flows that create jobs, build local supply chains and generate tax revenue. In short, they turn aid into sustainable, productive capital that benefits everyone eventually.

Let’s focus on blended finance for a bit. When a concessional tranche protects the first losses in a renewable energy fund, commercial investors often follow. The result is not only megawatts of clean power, it’s factories powered, electricians trained, and small businesses that can finally refrigerate produce. Imagine the headline: “How a $50 million concessional tranche unlocked $300 million for Nigerian solar and 10,000 new jobs.” That’s the type of deal storytelling that makes abstract finance tangible and politically relevant.

Why the System Needs to Change

What we have now are fragile debt dynamics, declining official development assistance, and opaque cross-border capital rules that penalise long-term development lending. At a time when the global debt has surpassed $100 trillion, rising interest costs mean that many governments are choosing refinancing over investment. And this is a long-term tragedy for growth. Unless we change incentives at the macro level, micro innovations will remain stopgaps.

Reforming global finance will take coalition building across treasuries, multilaterals and private capital. It will require stronger domestic resource mobilisation in emerging economies, coupled with international reforms that make patient, long-term capital attractive. The OECD’s report gives us both the diagnosis and the toolkit to address this issue. We now need the experiments scaled with urgency and the political will that makes those experiments feel inevitable and desirable.

If we succeed, the payoff will yield jobs, industrial growth, healthier populations and resilient communities that can plan for the future rather than merely respond to the next disaster and depend on aid. That is the pitch development finance needs to make: this is not charity. This is an investment in markets, in people, in the stability that underpins trade and growth. Write that story, and the dollars are more likely to follow.

Get the latest news and insights that are shaping the world. Subscribe to Impact Newswire to stay informed and be part of the global conversation.

Got a story to share? Pitch it to us at info@impactnews-wire.com and reach the right audience worldwide!


Discover more from Impact Newswire

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Scroll to Top

Discover more from Impact Newswire

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading