At a memorial service in Washington state, a widow used hologram technology to recreate her late husband speaking, joking, and answering questions in front of mourners, turning a rural American funeral into an unexpected test case for how far digital tools can go in reshaping grief, memory, and the boundaries between presence and absence.

When Pam Cronrath’s husband died last year after nearly 60 years of marriage, she made him a promise.
“I promised him a super wake,” she said in an interview with the BBC.
What she did not expect was that fulfilling that promise would lead her into one of the most experimental corners of modern technology: holographic reconstruction of the dead.
At a memorial service in Wenatchee, Washington, a small agricultural city on the eastern edge of the Cascade Mountains, more than 200 mourners gathered to say goodbye to Bill Cronrath. What they saw was not only a funeral portrait or video montage. It was a life size hologram of Bill, speaking, joking, and answering questions as though he were in the room.
“Now, before anyone gets confused, I’m not actually here in Valhalla today,” the hologram said. “Is this going to be fun?”
For a moment, many in the room believed what they were seeing was live.
“It was overwhelming,” Pam, 78, said later. “Some genuinely couldn’t understand how it was happening.”
The project was built using holographic systems developed by companies including Proto Hologram and Hyperreal, firms that normally work with entertainment studios and public figures. In recent years, similar technologies have been used to recreate celebrities on stage or preserve performances. But in this case, the subject was a private citizen, and the goal was not spectacle but memory.
Hyperreal’s founder, Remington Scott, said the company’s approach differs from so called grief technologies that rely on pre recorded responses or artificial dialogue systems.
“Those systems are meaningful, but they’re constructed,” he said. “They’re selecting from pre-recorded material or generating an approximation.”
“What we do is comprehensive capture, likeness, voice, motion, performance, to create something people who knew the person recognise immediately,” he added.
In Bill Cronrath’s case, there was a complication. He had already died. There were no recent recordings that could be used to build a full digital likeness.
Instead, Pam wrote the script herself.
“I knew him for 60 years, so I wrote it the way I believed he would speak,” she said.
The couple had been married for nearly six decades. Pam had promised her husband she would spend about $2,000 on the memorial. The final cost, she said, ended up “at least 10 to 15 times” higher as the project expanded in scope and technical complexity.
Engineers worked to reconstruct Bill’s voice using limited archival recordings. Earlier audio captured a stronger voice, while later recordings reflected declining health. The result, they told the family, was an approximation intended to feel familiar rather than perfect.
At the service, the hologram did more than deliver a scripted eulogy. It took part in a staged question and answer session, hosted by Bill’s nephew.
At one point, it joked that marrying Pam, despite his nerves, had been the “best decision I ever didn’t make.”
Pam said the reaction in the room was immediate and emotional.
“People were aghast,” she said.
One of her sons later noted only a subtle imperfection. “His voice is just a little bit off,” he said.
For Pam, that detail underscored how closely the reconstruction matched her memory of him.
In recent years, technology companies have experimented with ways to simulate the presence of the dead. Some systems allow users to record responses while alive so that software can later generate conversational replies. Others build interactive avatars from archival data.
Scott argues that this project sits in a different category.
“It’s closer to commissioning a portrait or a memoir than anything else,” he said.
Pam is careful to say the hologram has not replaced grief.
“It’s like looking at photos, or old videos,” she said. “It doesn’t get boring. When you’re hurting, it helps to feel like that person is still right there with you.”
Still, she understands why the idea unsettles some people. The blending of memory, simulation, and presence raises questions that extend beyond one family.
Experts in digital ethics and bereavement caution that such technologies can blur the boundary between remembrance and replacement. Dr. Elaine Kasket, a cyberpsychologist and visiting professor at the Centre for Death and Society at the University of Bath, said there is a risk that grief becomes something to be managed through technology.
“If an individual griever wishes to use digital remains to remember their loved one, that is their grief, and we should not question or criticise other people’s needs and preferences in mourning,” she said. “The problem today, in my view, is the platformisation of grief, datafying our dead, commodifying them, curating their presence in our lives, and making mourners financially and psychologically dependent upon the platforms that reanimate and house them.”
Dr. Jennifer Cearns of the University of Manchester’s Centre for Digital Trust and Society said the central question is consent and purpose.
“What matters, then, is how these technologies are used, as forms of memorialisation rather than replacement, and ideally with the consent of the person whose likeness or data is being mobilised,” she said.
For Pam, the debate remains abstract compared with the experience of loss.
Seven months after the memorial, she still replays the recording. One moment stands out.
“I love you,” the hologram says during the service.
“That means a lot to me,” she said quietly.
In her telling, the project was never about technology itself.
“It was about Bill,” she said. “About honouring his humour, his kindness, and the way he made people feel.”
As the tools for reconstructing presence become more advanced, her story sits at an uneasy intersection of memory and simulation, where the boundaries of farewell are no longer fixed, and where even death can, for a moment, be made to speak.
Get the latest news and insights that are shaping the world. Subscribe to Impact Newswire to stay informed and be part of the global conversation.
Got a story to share? Pitch it to us at info@impactnews-wire.com and reach the right audience worldwide
Faustine Ngila is the AI Editor at Impact Newswire, based in Nairobi, Kenya. He is an award-winning journalist specializing in artificial intelligence, blockchain, and emerging technologies.
He previously worked as a global technology reporter at Quartz in New York and Digital Frontier in London, where he covered innovation, startups, and the global digital economy.
With years of experience reporting on cutting-edge technologies, Faustine focuses on AI developments, industry trends, and the impact of technology on society.
Discover more from Impact Newswire
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



